Our 62nd annual international Conference | february 27 - march 1, 2025 | orlando, florida

Registration is Now Open!

1877

Adolph Kussmal portrait

1877

A Professor of Medicine at Strassburg, Adolph Kussmal, is credited with creating the term “word-blindness” to describe individuals who struggled with reading despite being of average or above average intelligence. Pulling from this work, German ophthalmologist and professor Rdolf Berlin created the term “dyslexia.”

A Brief History of Dyslexia, Oxford University

1896

1896

W. Pringle Morgan writes the first report on “Congenital Word-Blindness.”

Mather, 2024

1902

Copy of "Congenital Word-Blindness"

1902

Ophthalmologist James Hinshelwood publishes “Congenital Word-Blindness with Reports on Two Cases.” The publication concludes that word-blindness seems to impact specific parts of the brain, that the problem with reading is not generalized to all areas of academics, and that early identification of “word blindness” is key.

Mather, 2024

1935

1935

Lee Edward Travis, one of the ‘founding fathers’ of speech-language pathology, publishes “Intellectual Factors” in the Thirty-Fourth Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education.

The publication includes that these disabilities are specific to a particular area, and are unexpected in reference to an individual’s intelligence. Travis breaks these disabilities down into different categories: 

Mather, 2024

1946

Syracuse University

1946

One of the first public school programs for learning disabilities was established in Syracuse University in New York by Dr. William Cruickshank, a professor of education and psychology who had a strong interest in special education. 

After World War II, there was a growing awareness for disabilities, as many soldiers returned home with permanent disabilities. The University of Syracuse developed classes and services for those with disabilities, and classes on teaching students with disabilities, and Dr. Willam Cruickshank directed this department.

William M. Cruickshank Papers, Syracuse University Library

1963

Dr. Samuel Kirk and a student

1963

1965

1965

Dr. Barbara Bateman, a colleague of Dr. Kirk, added to his ideas on identifying learning disabilities, and suggested looking for achievement discrepancy when trying to identify a learning disability. An achievement discrepancy occurs when a learner’s low achievement scores don’t align with their expected achievement levels.

This is the first time ability-achievement discrepancy was associated with specific learning disability identification.

.

Mather, 2024

1965

President Lyndon B. Johnson signs the ESEA

1965

The Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (ESEA) was enacted by President Lyndon B. Johnson. The ESEA distributed federal funds to public schools, which provided funding for supplemental educational services, educational research and training, and special education services.

Paul, 2016

1966

1966

Congress began working on an omnibus special education bill, and there was debate on whether or not the category of specific learning disabilities should be included due to the lack of an agreed-upon definition and identification method. 

During this time an LD Task Force composed of medical professionals worked to create a definition, and introduced the term ‘minimal brain dysfunction.’ This term was controversial because it was vague.

Hajovsky et.al, 2024

1966

1966

The Education of Handicapped Act was passed, but did not include protections for students with specific learning disabilities.

Hajovsky et.al, 2024

1968

1968

The Second Edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-II) included specific learning disabilities for the first time as a preliminary category. There was no diagnostic criteria given for SLD, as it needed further consideration and study. 

Hajovsky et.al, 2024

1969

1969

A second task force was organized to better define learning disabilities. This task force was mainly composed of educators, who moved away from the term ‘minimal brain dysfunction’ and pulled from Bateman’s ideas of academic achievement discrepancy.

Hajovsky et.al, 2024

1969

1969

The Children with Specific Learning Disabilities Act of 1969 was passed, which included a working definition of learning disabilities within the Federal law. With this definition a medical cause was presumed, though the focus was on the mandate for remedial education designed to address the unique needs of children with learning disabilities. 

Hajovsky et.al, 2024

1969

1969

President Richard Nixon signed the 1969 ESEA Amendments, which included Title VI, which included funding dedicated to the education of individuals with disabilities.

(Paul, 2016)

1973

1973

The Rehabilitation Act of 1973, a landmark civil rights law, was passed. Section 504 of the Act prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability, and requires that students with disabilities receive a free and appropriate public education (FAPE). 

The Rehabilitation Act is one of the first laws to include disabilities in civil rights. However, regulations to ensure that ‘reasonable accommodations’ were put in place for individuals with disabilities were not yet formed.

Eveland, 2024

1975

The ACLD (precursor to LDA) marches with a sign with their logo

1975

Public Law 94-142, the Education for All Handicapped Children Act, now the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), is signed. The IDEA guarantees that children with learning disabilities will receive a free and appropriate public education, which includes services and accommodations. Before the IDEA was implemented, roughly 1.9 million children with disabilities were excluded from public schools.

The IDEA also states that students with disabilities, when possible, should be educated in the least restrictive environment, which, for many students, is the general education classroom.

The Learning Disabilities Association of America was a key advocate in ensuring that specific learning disabilities (SLD) were a category protected and included in the IDEA. Today, students with specific learning disabilities are the largest category protected by the IDEA.

A History of the IDEA, U.S Department of Education

1977

Stickers and buttons from the Sign 504 movement.

1977

The “Sign 504!” Protests begin. The lack of regulations created for Section 504 meant it was difficult for the law to be enforced. Section 504 was often not followed by organizations that did not want to spend money on accessibility requirements. 

In April of 1977, 10 protests emerged across the country to pressure the government to sign the regulations for Section 504. These protests took the form of sit-ins in Health, Education, and Welfare offices, and the sit-in in San Francisco lasted 26 days.

A group of protestors visited Washington DC in an attempt to speak to President Carter, but were avoided. As media coverage increased the pressure of the protests, the regulations to enforce Section 504 were signed.

Eveland, 2024

1990

Signing of the IDEA

1990

The Education for All Handicapped Children Act (EHA) was reauthorized, and the name was changed to Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The 1990 reauthorization also stated that part of a student’s Individualized Education Plan must include an Individual Transition Plan to help the student to transition to post-secondary life.

A History of the IDEA, U.S. Department of Education

1990

1990

The ‘Capitol Crawl’ cemented the passing of The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).

The ADA protects individuals with disabilities from discrimination in employment, state and local government, public transportation and accommodations, and telecommunications. 

The process to turn the ADA into law had been stalled, which led protestors to protest at the Capitol on March 12th, 1990. Several protestors set down their mobility aids to crawl the Capitol steps as a demonstration of the challenges that individuals with disabilities face.

Zinn Education Project

1997

1997

IDEA was reauthorized again, and it included an addition of a requirement that the general education teacher should be part of the IEP team.

The Learning Disabilities Association of America worked hard to ensure that all students had the right to go to school by limiting the number of days students could be suspended from school.

History of the IDEA, U.S. Department of Education

1997

1997

The Department of Education requested a method for identifying specific learning disabilities.

An ability-achievement discrepancy model for identification was put in place until a consensus could be reached, but a consensus was never reached, and the ability-achievement discrepancy model for identification of learning disabilities was kept in place.

Hajovsky et.al, 2024

2001

No Child Left Behind logo

2001

The No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) was passed. NCLB aimed to get every child to grade-level in reading and math by 2014. By requiring schools to include students with disabilities in their accountability measures, NCLB resulted in school districts feeling more pressure to supply the interventions and accommodations necessary to allow students with SLD and other disabilities to achieve higher academic standards.

Turner, 2015

2002

Healthy Children Project logo

2002

LDA started the Healthy Children Project program (HCP), focusing on the preventable causes of learning disabilities including chemical exposures that harm brain health.

2004

2004

IDEA was reauthorized and included an addition of response to intervention (RTI) that could be used in identification of students with learning disabilities.

History of the IDEA, U.S. Department of Education

2006

2006

The final publication of the regulations to accompany IDEA was issued. A number of hearings were held throughout the country and LDA of America had representatives at many of those hearings.

History of the IDEA, U.S. Department of Education

2014

2014

LDA contributed to the ADA Amendments Act to ensure that individuals with specific learning disabilities continued to receive the benefits of the ADA. LDA was successful in those attempts.

2015

2015

The Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) was reauthorized and renamed to the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA). As Congress moved to reauthorize the ESSA, LDA recommended that students with learning disabilities receive access to the general education curriculum, to maintain “students with disabilities” as a specific subgroup for accountability purposes, to include a definition of “universal design for learning” and incorporate these principles in the law, and to require schools to determine and assure the availability of social/emotional and mental health services for students as part of their school improvement plans.

2018

2018

LDA advocated for reauthorization of the Juvenile Justice Act. A high proportion of inmates in both the juvenile and adult justice systems are individuals with learning disabilities, with estimates ranging from 10 to 40%, and up to 60% with disabilities in general.

Title V of the Act has been amended to provide Youth PROMISE grants for tutoring and remedial education services, with a primary focus on reading and math, mental health services, and youth leadership development programs that will empower and build confidence in struggling young people.

These include a prohibition against incarceration for status offenses (conduct not considered criminal for adults, such as truancy and curfew violations), keeping youth out of “sight and sound” contact with adult inmates while incarcerated, banning housing of youth offenders in adult facilities while awaiting trial as juveniles, and mandating that states address disproportionality in the incarceration of minorities.

2023

2023

LDA developed interdisciplinary Principles and Standards to provide a guide for best practices in the evaluation and identification of Specific Learning Disabilities.

These research-based standards were informed by a collaboration between professional representatives and ambassadors from the fields of school psychology, cognitive psychology, speech and language pathology, special education, literacy, mathematics education, and medicine. 

Citations: 

A Brief History of Dyslexia. The History of Dyslexia. Oxford University. Retrieved from

https://dyslexiahistory.web.ox.ac.uk/brief-history-dyslexia

A History of the Individuals with Disabilities Act. U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from

https://sites.ed.gov/idea/IDEA-History

Eveland, A. (2024). 504 Protest: Disability, Community, and Civil Rights. National Park Service. Retrieved from

https://www.nps.gov/articles/000/504-protest-disability-community-and-civil-rights.htm

Hajovsky, D., Maki, K., McGill, R., Niileksela, C., (2024, October). Kind Conversations About a Wicked Problem: The Science and Practice of Identifying Specific Learning Disabilities. Learning Disabilities Association of America. Lecture. 

Kirk, S. A. (1963, April 16) Conference on Exploration into Problems of the Perpetually Handicapped Child 

March 12, 1990: Disability Rights Activists’ “Capitol Crawl” for the ADA. Zinn Education Project. Retrieved from

https://www.zinnedproject.org/news/tdih/capitol-crawl-for-ADA

Mather, N. (2023, April). A Brief History of Specific Learning Disability History. Learning Disabilities Association of America. Lecture. 

Paul, C.A. (2016). Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965. Social Welfare History Project. Retrieved from 

https://socialwelfare.library.vcu.edu/programs/education/elementary-and-secondary-education-act-of-1965

Turner, C. (2015, October). No Child Left Behind: What Worked, What Didn’t. NPR. Retrieved from 

https://www.npr.org/sections/ed/2015/10/27/443110755/no-child-left-behind-what-worked-what-didnt

William M. Cruickshank Papers. University Archives, Special Collections Research Center, Syracuse University Libraries. Retrieved from 

https://library.syracuse.edu/digital/guides_sua/html/sua_cruickshank_wm.htm